FSMIS (August 30, 2013): President Manny Mori has sought the
concurrence of the FSM Congress in lowering the Constitutional requirement that
75 percent of votes cast on an amendment must be achieved in three of the four
States in the FSM in order for the amendment to become part of the FSM
Constitution.
In an August
28 letter to Speaker Dohsis Halbert, President Mori called for the lowering of
the “threshold” requirement from 75 percent to 60 percent stating that the
current requirement “is very challenging” and is “next to impossible”.
“While I do
not brush aside the rationale behind the entrenchment of constitutional
provisions by making them hard to change, there are times when constitutional
changes are imperative and unavoidable because of changing social conditions
and economic realities.”
President Mori
alluded to a specific example of a proposed amendment that failed to muster the
required margins on more than one occasion and was not accepted even though a
significant majority of voters were in favor.
“For
example, dual citizenship has been proposed on numerous occasions in response
to changing demographics and as a result of growing number of FSM citizens
residing abroad who are at the same time supporting their families back home”,
the President pointed out.
President
Mori looked at the political-historical context that gave birth to what he
spoke of as a “compromised constitution” that was crafted under very different
conditions for the Micronesia of Trust Territory days.
The
constitution was designed “to provide authority for independence and self-governance”,
among other goals and principles, to a near-splitting formation of entities,
each with its own perceived economic opportunities and political aspirations. Only Micronesia was left to ratify the
constitution that heralded the charting of the Federated States of Micronesia
in 1979 as a new self-governing nation.
“Thirty-four
years of governance under a compromised constitution gave us enough experiences
and lessons”, President Mori said. He concluded that these lessons and
experiences have “made us realize that we could do more good things as a nation
without the unnecessary restrictions” that hampered new aspirations under
present-day challenges and realities.
The proposed
bill to enact the lowering of the threshold requirement also contains a provision
that calls for the proposal to be submitted to voters in the FSM 2015 general
election. Therefore, if Congress passed the bill and it eventually became a
law, then the FSM voters will decide the fate of the proposal in March, 2015.
Should the threshold remain at 75%, or adjusted downward to 60%?
For more
information, write fsmpio@mail.fm.
No comments:
Post a Comment